SVUnit Scripting Proposal Version 2

I’ve had people asking about the SVUnit new scripting proposal I posted a few months back. I forgot about it for a while but now I’m back. I’ve taken some of the feedback I’ve received and folded it into a new version. Slightly different in that I’ve added switches for compile and runtime options.

Here’s the help. Take a look and let me know what you think…

Screen Shot 2014-06-05 at 8.54.54 PM

 

 

This is ready to go. I have a couple people trying it out. If you’d be willing to test-drive the new scripts before an official release, I’d sure appreciate it. Just let me know at neil.johnson@agilesoc.com and I’ll ship you a copy. If all goes well, I’d expect to release this within a month or so as version 3.0.

Thanks in advance for you comments!

-neil

Share/Bookmark

About nosnhojn

I've been working in ASIC and FPGA development for more than 13 years at various IP and product development companies and now as a consultant with XtremeEDA Corp. In 2008 I took an interest in agile software development. I've found a massive amount of material out there related to agile development, all of it is interesting and most of it is applicable to hardware development in one form or another. So I'm here to find what agile concepts will work for hardware development and to help other developers use them successfully. I've been fortunate to have the chance to speak about agile hardware development at various conferences like Agile2011, Agile2012, Intel Lean/Agile Conference 2013 and SNUG. I also do lunch-n-learn talks for small groups and enjoy talking to anyone with an agile hardware story to tell! You can find me at neil.johnson@agilesoc.com.
This entry was posted in Functional Verification and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to SVUnit Scripting Proposal Version 2

  1. nosnhojn says:

    A correction I just made was add modelsim and riviera as possible simulator options. they were always possible, just not in the usage. I also received the suggestion of having proper GNU conventions for switches (‘-’ for single char switches and ‘–’ for multi-char). That will be part of the polished version.

    -neil

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>