-
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
- nosnhojn on MiniTB: Finally… a Testbench Framework for Designers
- Michael Thompson on MiniTB: Finally… a Testbench Framework for Designers
- nosnhojn on UVM Report Mock Update
- Bryan on UVM Report Mock Update
- nosnhojn on MiniTB: Finally… a Testbench Framework for Designers
-
Catagories
Tags
Agile2011 agile@intel AgileSoC Cadence CDNLive collaboration constrained random DAC delivery DVCon EDA EDA360 Emacs embedded software emulation ESL Featured formal verification fun functionality functional verification guest blog incremental development iterative development Kanban linkedin Mentor Mentor Graphics org-mode pair programming Pomodoro project planning survey Requirements retrospectives SNUG svunit TDD TDD month teamwork usability User2User UVM UVM-UTest UVM Express Verification Horizons-
Monthly Archives: May 2012
Unit Testing And TDD: Too Different To Compare
Here’s another post inspired by James Grenning and his “TDD with C” tutorial. Going through an abbreviated version of that tutorial last year in Salt Lake City at Agile2011 was what got me started with TDD. It inspired TDD month … Continue reading
Posted in Functional Verification, TDD
7 Comments
Functional Verification Doesn’t Have To Be A Sideshow
This is another one of those challenge-the-way-we-think-about-functional-verification posts. The motivation behind it comes from a few different places. First is a blog posted on eetimes designline by Brian Bailey a couple weeks back called Enough of the sideshows – it’s … Continue reading
Unicorns, Leprechauns and Reusable Verification IP
There are times when I use agilesoc.com to step out on a limb and challenge the general consensus in hardware development. This post would definitely qualify as one of those times. I don’t think the reusable verification IP we’ve been … Continue reading
Posted in Functional Verification
1 Comment
(Wasted) Effort Spent In Verification
I just spent a few minutes reading Harry Foster’s analysis of a functional verification study commissioned by Mentor Graphics and carried out by Wilson Research Group in 2010. There’s lots of good information in Harry’s analysis – there’s 9 posts … Continue reading